Light-reflecting Makeup

1

LARRAÑAGA IN PERSPECTIVE 18.08.2009

18/08/2009 | VIEWER | IN REVIEW | Page 1

Larrañaga 'Mujica is not qualified to be president. "
17.08.2009 | 11.38

Having been ratedC This weekend I went was very busy for the next election, because-as provided the Constitution of



Republic in the last renovation - had to meet the national convention were elected in the primaries from June 28 to officially declare the candidates for vice president

Republic by each party. In this context, there were several speeches, was staged, there was betting on marketing, image and positioning. Pero in particular highlighted a crash, particularly serious, including Jorge Larranaga and Jose Mujica. JUAN ANDRÉS Elhordoy: The background of this weekend's episode starts at the convention of the National Party (PN). There, Jorge Larranaga said Danilo Astori and Mujica José "are united by fear of defeat." Larrañaga considered at the next election will face two models: an inclusive, PN, and a confrontational, the Frente Amplio (FA). " He also criticized the leftist coalition of "making promises while still in the government."

CJorge Larrañaga. What places this verbal confrontation between his speech on Saturday and Sunday Mujica reaction?

Jorge Larranaga:
I think you have to put it in a frame and is sorry for passing this election campaign. A political criticism can never match personal attacks. Senator Mujica changed but not changed suit intolerance, unfortunately can not respond that way, journalism disqualifies one day, another day disqualify employers, another day disqualify politicians. It's as if I had branded a poodle because he was asking about 'plates' to Brazil when he met with Lula and when he hadmistades related to Chavez or Kirchner. I do not think it will be the way to answer because we must also do the day after. Mujica senator himself has said that care must be taken the day after, "and the day after what could be the scenario? The stage can be Mujica Chairman, and will have to talk to the PN and with us, or that the PN won the election, and Senator Mujica going to have to talk to who will be vice president of Uruguay.

I think this is very bad because we only express was that the FA was united by the intention not to lose. Then, the other strong political criticism I made in my party convention was to say that it is illogicalfor example on Sunday newspaper El Pais and El Observador newspaper interpreted the convention on Saturday in the same direction. The title of El Pais says, "Larranaga took Mujica-attack role and the Front, while Lacalle is presented with a more conciliatory tone and speaking more slowly and with proposals." What's your points? "Indeed have separated the waters, have been distinguished in the PN formula different strategies for planting in the campaign and to highlight differences with the FA?

JL - There is a strategy where one is the hard and the soft one, simply plays the role each has to meet. I have not taken the position to attack the FA and FA candidates, pecause we have also been telling the country what are the responses to the issues that today afflict the Uruguayans in the workplace, in health, education, young people who leave, the lack of international integration, it is not thereof. Perhaps the environment of political speech or expressions that may lead to, but not part of a thoughtful strategy.

JAE - But there was a clear difference. Watching the speech on Saturday, tones, expressions and pose were different.

JL - Dr. Lacalle and different people are speaking, I've always had a way of doing politics very front. It is good that the candidate